Question

我正在使用-g标志和-O0编译代码。请参阅下面的valgrind输出。

我只想知道我是否可以看到什么是无效的？我只看到这个：

==2566== Invalid free() / delete / delete[] / realloc()
==2566==    at 0x4A21244: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:468)
==2566==    by 0x500FB7A: free_mem (in /lib64/libc-2.4.so)
==2566==    by 0x500F781: __libc_freeres (in /lib64/libc-2.4.so)
==2566==    by 0x491C719: _vgnU_freeres (vg_preloaded.c:62)
==2566==    by 0x4F4E6F4: exit (in /lib64/libc-2.4.so)
==2566==    by 0x4F3930A: (below main) (in /lib64/libc-2.4.so)
==2566==  Address 0x403ef10 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==2566==
==2566==
==2566== HEAP SUMMARY:
==2566==     in use at exit: 2,416,506 bytes in 1,844 blocks
==2566==   total heap usage: 62,683 allocs, 60,840 frees, 2,957,293 bytes allocated
==2566==
==2566== Searching for pointers to 1,844 not-freed blocks
==2566== Checked 5,445,056 bytes

代码：

int HoleInstrumentenDiffListeDB(GTree *tree)
{

  OCI_Connection* cn;
  OCI_Statement* st;
  OCI_Resultset* rs;
  if (!OCI_Initialize(err_handler, NULL, OCI_ENV_DEFAULT))
        return EXIT_FAILURE;
  char query[500];
  query[0] ='\0';
  cn = OCI_ConnectionCreate( "db", "u",  "p", OCI_SESSION_DEFAULT);
  st = OCI_StatementCreate(cn);
  strcat(query, "SELECT ...");

  OCI_ExecuteStmt(st, query);
  rs = OCI_GetResultset(st);
  int i = 1;
  int j = 0;
  char *symbolp;
  while (OCI_FetchNext(rs)){


    const char * symbolp = OCI_GetString(rs,2);
    switch ( * OCI_GetString(rs,3))
    {
      case 'N':
        insertQot(tree, symbolp, OCI_GetInt(rs, 1) );
        printf("new \n");
        break;
      case 'U':
        insertQot(tree, symbolp, OCI_GetInt(rs, 1) );
        printf("upd \n");
        break;
      case 'D':
        deleteQot(tree, symbolp);
        printf("del \n");
        break;
     }
  }
  OCI_Cleanup();
  return 1;
}

int main ()
{

  GTree* t = g_tree_new_full((GCompareDataFunc)g_ascii_strcasecmp,NULL,g_free,g_free);
  HoleInstrumentenListe(t);
  HoleInstrumentenDiffListeDB(t);
  g_tree_destroy (t);
}

Answer 1

我认为你应该在line循环中释放while ()，而不是在for ()循环的末尾。我相信getline()只会在第一个参数为* NULL时分配内存，所以你实际上是使用第一次调用分配的缓冲区一遍又一遍。

但是自从我写了很多C以来已经很久了！

__libc_freeres（）中的free（）/ delete / delete [] / realloc（）无效

1 个答案: