我正在编写代码,用于测量具有特定大小的数组的不同排序方法的不同排序时间,并在GUI中显示输出时间。我大部分时间都在工作,但程序每次都没有显示相同的结果。例如,一次运行将为0.2毫秒,下一次运行将为0.1毫秒。我相信问题出在runSort()方法中。有人能帮助我吗?这是代码:
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
import javax.swing.*;
import java.util.Random;
import java.util.Arrays;
public class Benchmarks extends JFrame
{
private static int numberOfRuns = 20;
private JTextField arraySizeInput, display;
private String sortMethodNames[] =
{"Selection Sort", "Insertion Sort", "Mergesort", "Quicksort", "Arrays.sort"};
private JComboBox chooseSortMethod;
private final long seed;
private int arraySize;
// Constructor
public Benchmarks()
{
super("Benchmarks");
Container c = getContentPane();
c.setLayout(new GridLayout(6, 1));
c.add(new JLabel(" Array size: "));
arraySizeInput = new JTextField(4);
arraySizeInput.setText("1000");
arraySizeInput.selectAll();
c.add(arraySizeInput);
chooseSortMethod = new JComboBox(sortMethodNames);
c.add(chooseSortMethod);
JButton run = new JButton("Run");
run.addActionListener(new RunButtonListener());
c.add(run);
c.add(new JLabel(" Avg Time (milliseconds): "));
display = new JTextField(" Ready");
display.setBackground(Color.YELLOW);
display.setEditable(false);
c.add(display);
// Use the same random number generator seed for all benchmarks
// in one run of this program:
seed = System.currentTimeMillis();
}
// Fills a[] with random numbers and sorts it using the sorting method
// specified in sortMethod:
// 1 -- Selection Sort
// 2 -- Insertion Sort
// 3 -- Mergesort
// 4 -- Quicksort
// This is repeated numberOfRuns times for better accuracy
// Returns the total time it took in milliseconds.
private long runSort(double[] a, int sortMethod, int numberOfRuns)
{
long startTime;
long endTime;
long diffTime;
Random generator = new Random(seed);
for(int i= a.length-1; i>0; i--)
{
a[i]= generator.nextDouble();
}
startTime= System.currentTimeMillis();
switch(sortMethod)
{
case 1: //Selection Sort
SelectionSort sel = new SelectionSort();
sel.sort(a);
break;
case 2: //Insertion Sort
InsertionSort nsert= new InsertionSort();
nsert.sort(a);
break;
case 3: //Merge Sort
Mergesort merge = new Mergesort();
merge.sort(a);
break;
case 4: // Quick Sort
Quicksort quick = new Quicksort();
quick.sort(a);
break;
}
endTime= System.currentTimeMillis();
diffTime= endTime- startTime;
return diffTime ;
}
// Handles Run button events
private class RunButtonListener implements ActionListener
{
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e)
{
String inputStr = arraySizeInput.getText().trim();
try
{
arraySize = Integer.parseInt(inputStr);
}
catch (NumberFormatException ex)
{
display.setText(" Invalid array size");
arraySize = 0;
return;
}
if (arraySize <= 0)
{
display.setText(" Invalid array size");
return;
}
if (arraySize <= 0)
return;
int sortMethod = chooseSortMethod.getSelectedIndex() + 1;
double a[] = new double[arraySize];
double avgTime = (double)runSort(a, sortMethod, numberOfRuns)
/ numberOfRuns;
display.setText(String.format(" %.2f", avgTime));
arraySizeInput.selectAll();
arraySizeInput.requestFocus();
System.out.println("Array size = " + arraySize +
" Runs = " + numberOfRuns + " " +
sortMethodNames[sortMethod - 1] + " avg time: " + avgTime);
}
}
//************************************************************
public static void main(String[] args)
{
numberOfRuns = 20;
if (args.length > 0)
{
int n = -1;
try
{
n = Integer.parseInt(args[0].trim());
}
catch (NumberFormatException ex)
{
System.out.println("Invalid command-line parameter");
System.exit(1);
}
if (n > 0)
numberOfRuns = n;
}
Benchmarks window = new Benchmarks();
window.setBounds(300, 300, 180, 200);
window.setDefaultCloseOperation(EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
window.setVisible(true);
}
}
感谢您的帮助。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
由于许多次要因素,例如计算机当时的繁忙程度,您会得到不同的结果。此外,System.currentTimeMillis()
本质上是不准确的;在某些系统上,5 ms可以测量为0到10 ms。为了在测量少量时间时获得更好的准确性,您应该使用System.nanoTime()
。此外,在测量开始时间和测量结束时间之间,您应该什么都没有。这意味着 no for或while循环,if语句或switch语句。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
你尝试的是根本不可能的。您需要一个保证cpu时间的系统。但是调度和不同的负载使得无法获得准确的时间。另外,Java-Garbage集合以及从java环境中优化的内容会改变您的结果。你可以使用像junitbenchmark这样的框架让代码运行多次 - 但是这不会给你一个真正可用的#34;结果。它可以帮助您确定每个算法相对于彼此的速度。