在Domino 64位服务器上的LotusScript调用NSFItemInfoNext崩溃服务器

时间:2014-03-24 11:01:37

标签: 64-bit lotus-domino lotus

我试图从LotusScript代理打电话给NSFItemInfoNext'在Domino 9.0.1 64位服务器上。呼叫NSFItemInfo'成功。代码已经过32位测试并且工作正常。该字段是一个分为几个项目的富文本字段。

    Type BLOCKID64
        Pool As Long
        Block As Integer
    End Type

    Declare Function W64_NSFItemInfo Lib LIB_W32 Alias "NSFItemInfo" (ByVal noteHandle As Long, ByVal itemName As String, ByVal nameLength As Integer, itemBlockID As BLOCKID64, valueDataType As Integer, valueBlockID As BLOCKID64, valueLength As Long) As Integer

    Declare Function W64_NSFItemInfoNext Lib LIB_W32 Alias "NSFItemInfoNext" (ByVal noteHandle As Long, ByVal prevItemBlockIDPool As Long, ByVal prevItemBlockIDBlock As Integer, ByVal itemName As String, ByVal nameLength As Integer, itemBlockID As BLOCKID64, valueDatatype As Integer, valueBlockID As BLOCKID64, valueLength As Long) As Integer

    Dim dbHandle As Long
    Dim noteHandle As Long
    Dim RTItemName As String
    Dim ItemBlockID As BLOCKID64
    Dim ItemDataType As Integer
    Dim ValueBlockID As BLOCKID64
    Dim ValueLength As Long
    Dim NextItemBlockID As BLOCKID64
    Dim NextItemDataType As Integer
    Dim NextValueBlockID As BLOCKID64
    Dim NextValueLength As Long
    Dim StatusResult As Integer

    RTItemName = "Body"

    NSFDbOpen - dbHandle: 377
    NSFNoteOpen - noteHandle: 43

    StatusResult = W64_NSFItemInfo(noteHandle, RTItemName, Len(RTItemName), ItemBlockID, ItemDataType, ValueBlockID, ValueLength)

    Results of call to NSFItemInfo:
    itemBlockID.Pool: 43
    itemBlockID.Block: 31312
    itemDataType: 1
    valueBlockID.Pool: 43
    valueBlockID.Block: 1120
    valueLength: 30176

    StatusResult = W64_NSFItemInfoNext(noteHandle, ItemBlockID.Pool, ItemBlockID.Block, RTItemName, Len(RTItemName), NextItemBlockID, NextItemDataType, NextItemValueBlockID, NextItemValueLength)

    Call to NSFItemInfoNext fails with the following crash:

    ############################################################
    ### thread 10/11: [   nAMgr:  1ca4:  0c60] FATAL THREAD
    ### FP=0x185ba4c8, PC=0x7723695a, SP=0x185ba4c8
    ### stkbase=0x185c0000, total stksize=1048576, used stksize=23352
    ### EAX=0x0000db76, EBX=0x00000538, ECX=0x185b9518, EDX=0xFFFFFFFF01E6AF0
    ### ESI=0x00000000, EDI=0x00000000, CS=0x00000033, SS=0xFFFFFFF0000002B
    ### DS=0x00000000, ES=0x00000000, FS=0x00000000, GS=0xFFFFFFF00000000 Flags=0x00000287
    ############################################################
     [ 1] 0x7723695a ntdll.ZwWaitForSingleObject+10 (0,0,0,0)
     [ 2] 0x76d6aeb0 kernel32.WaitForSingleObjectEx+160 (538,185babb0,0,538)
    @[ 3] 0x7FEE2846AA2 nnotes.OSRunExternalScript+1666 (1ca4,0,426,5)
    @[ 4] 0x7FEE28472EA nnotes.FRTerminateWindowsResources+1738 (0,5,1,2b9190)
    @[ 5] 0x7FEE2847A79 nnotes.OSFaultCleanupExt+1177 (185bbe60,772f9d40,185bf9d0,1)
    @[ 6] 0x7FEE2848077 nnotes.OSFaultCleanup+23 (772f9d40,2a2,29,185bb3e0)
    @[ 7] 0x7FEE28AA997 nnotes.OSNTUnhandledExceptionFilter+423         (185bbe60,772f9d40,30,185bbe60)
     [ 8] 0x76dfcbef kernel32.UnhandledExceptionFilter+351 (185bbe60,4a04f3ca,0,1)
     [ 9] 0x77261348 ntdll.RtlInitializeAtomPackage+72 (7FEE4623CB0,13000000016,200005445,29)
     [10] 0x77228ec4 ntdll.__C_specific_handler+140 (185bf9d0,185bf9d0,185c0000,77216411)
     [11] 0x7722546d ntdll.RtlIntegerToChar+1341 (1,0,185bf9d0,185c0000)
     [12] 0x77229267 ntdll.__C_specific_handler+1071 (185bca40,2598ca4,0,771f0000)
     [13] 0x7723687a ntdll.KiUserExceptionDispatcher+46 (2598ca4,2b,185bcb88,188fc110)
    @[14] 0x7FEE350B7C4 nnotes.NSFItemInfoNext+100 (185bcd20,2b,188fc7a0,188fc110)
    @[15] 0x7FEE3B29803 nnotes.LSsThread::DoCCallout+6355 (ffff,188fc758,0,2598ca4)
    @[16] 0x7FEE3B2B3FF nnotes.LSsThread::CProdCallFunction+431 (2598ca4,185bd7c8,23,ffe8)
    @[17] 0x7FEE3AED292 nnotes.LSsThread::NRun+8722 (188fc110,185b08a4,3,2)
    @[18] 0x7FEE3AEDAD8 nnotes.LSsThread::Run+296 (188fc110,76b9028,0,2)
    @[19] 0x7FEE3AA7C3A nnotes.LSIThread::RunInternal+106 (76b9028,76b9028,0,0)
    @[20] 0x7FEE3AA7EF6 nnotes.LSIThread::RunToCompletion+390 (76a8b28,76a8b28,185bdb30,0)
    @[21] 0x7FEE3AA0CAA nnotes.CLSIDocument::RunScript+762 (76aa828,76a8aa8,0,76a8aa8)
    @[22] 0x7FEE2F1B8EC nnotes.CRawActionLotusScript::Run+668         (20000200,7FE00000026,C2520646E756F46,56D756300000026)
    @[23] 0x7FEE2F16E5F nnotes.CRawAction::Run+95 (0,76a8a68,76aa828,7FEE28F0005)
    @[24] 0x7FEE2F17B44 nnotes.CRawAction::Execute+260 (ff,0,0,8f9b)
    @[25] 0x7FEE2F1497E nnotes.CAssistant::Run+4174 (200002bf,185bea40,76a8b28,0)
    @[26] 0x7FEE2F32B9F nnotes.AgentRun+1711 (1,0,0,10)
    @[27] 0x7FEF99F8420 namgrdll.ExecConsoleAgent+320 (80,adc92,76aa828,76aa028)
    @[28] 0x7FEE2858B52 nnotes.ThreadWrapper+258 (0,0,0,0)
     [29] 0x76d5aefd kernel32.BaseThreadInitThunk+13 (0,0,0,0)
     [30] 0x77216411 ntdll.RtlUserThreadStart+33 (0,0,0,0)

我试过改变游泳池'在BLOCKID64结构中为Double但没有工作并导致返回到' Block'为0(零)。

有什么想法或建议吗?有没有其他人遇到过来自LotusScript的64位API调用的问题。

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:1)

我建议将 ItemBlockID 更改为 Double 而不是使用结构。你不管怎么说都不使用这个结构(除了传递下一个电话之外的其他任何东西)。

Declare Function W64_NSFItemInfo Lib LIB_W32 Alias "NSFItemInfo" (ByVal noteHandle As Long, ByVal itemName As String, ByVal nameLength As Integer, itemBlockID As Double, valueDataType As Integer, valueBlockID As BLOCKID64, valueLength As Long) As Integer

Declare Function W64_NSFItemInfoNext Lib LIB_W32 Alias "NSFItemInfoNext" (ByVal noteHandle As Long, ByVal prevItemBlockIDDbl As  As Double, ByVal itemName As String, ByVal nameLength As Integer, itemBlockID As BLOCKID64, valueDatatype As Integer, valueBlockID As BLOCKID64, valueLength As Long) As Integer

关于如果有任何人在使用LotusScript的64位API调用时出现问题的问题 - 如果有人设法“一路走来”,那么我会感到惊讶&#34;。例如,一旦你得到了这些项目,你可能想要阅读内容......我仍然坚持那个: - /我以为我已经弄明白了......但那个代码在哪里: - )< / p>

相关问题