主线程没有调用堆栈的Java线程转储? (JSVC)

时间:2010-04-25 12:09:39

标签: java thread-dump

我们有一个作为守护进程运行的java进程(在jsvc下)。每隔几天它就停止做任何工作;输出到日志文件停止(它是非常详细的,每隔5分钟)并且它不消耗CPU或IO。

日志文件中也没有记录异常,也没有记录在syserr或sysout中。最后一个日志语句就在数据库提交完成之前,但是在数据库服务器(MySQL)上没有打开连接并且查看代码,之后应该总是有额外的日志输出,即使它遇到了异常,本来要冒泡了。

我发现最奇怪的是在线程转储(包含在下面)中,我们的代码中根本没有线程,并且主线程似乎没有任何上下文:

"main" prio=10 tid=0x0000000000614000 nid=0x445d runnable [0x0000000000000000]
  java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE

如前所述,这是一个使用jsvc运行的守护程序进程,但我不知道是否与它有任何关系(我可以重构代码以允许直接运行它,进行测试)。

有关此处可能发生的事情的任何建议吗?

谢谢... dwh

完整的线程转储:

Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (14.2-b01 mixed mode):

"MySQL Statement Cancellation Timer" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00002aaaf81b8800 nid=0x447b in Object.wait() [0x00002aaaf6a22000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
 - waiting on <0x00002aaab5556d50> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
 at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:485)
 at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:483)
 - locked <0x00002aaab5556d50> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
 at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:462)

"Low Memory Detector" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00000000006a4000 nid=0x4479 runnable [0x0000000000000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE

"CompilerThread1" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00000000006a1000 nid=0x4477 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE

"CompilerThread0" daemon prio=10 tid=0x000000000069d000 nid=0x4476 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE

"Signal Dispatcher" daemon prio=10 tid=0x000000000069b000 nid=0x4465 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE

"Finalizer" daemon prio=10 tid=0x0000000000678800 nid=0x4464 in Object.wait() [0x00002aaaf61d6000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
 - waiting on <0x00002aaab54a1cb8> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
 at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:118)
 - locked <0x00002aaab54a1cb8> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
 at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:134)
 at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:159)

"Reference Handler" daemon prio=10 tid=0x0000000000676800 nid=0x4463 in Object.wait() [0x00002aaaf60d5000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
 - waiting on <0x00002aaab54a1cf0> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)
 at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:485)
 at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:116)
 - locked <0x00002aaab54a1cf0> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)

"main" prio=10 tid=0x0000000000614000 nid=0x445d runnable [0x0000000000000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE

"VM Thread" prio=10 tid=0x0000000000670000 nid=0x4462 runnable 

"GC task thread#0 (ParallelGC)" prio=10 tid=0x000000000061e000 nid=0x445e runnable 

"GC task thread#1 (ParallelGC)" prio=10 tid=0x0000000000620000 nid=0x445f runnable 

"GC task thread#2 (ParallelGC)" prio=10 tid=0x0000000000622000 nid=0x4460 runnable 

"GC task thread#3 (ParallelGC)" prio=10 tid=0x0000000000623800 nid=0x4461 runnable 

"VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=10 tid=0x00000000006a6800 nid=0x447a waiting on condition 

JNI global references: 797

Heap
 PSYoungGen      total 162944K, used 48388K [0x00002aaadff40000, 0x00002aaaf2ab0000, 0x00002aaaf5490000)
  eden space 102784K, 47% used [0x00002aaadff40000,0x00002aaae2e81170,0x00002aaae63a0000)
  from space 60160K, 0% used [0x00002aaaeb850000,0x00002aaaeb850000,0x00002aaaef310000)
  to   space 86720K, 0% used [0x00002aaae63a0000,0x00002aaae63a0000,0x00002aaaeb850000)
 PSOldGen        total 699072K, used 699072K [0x00002aaab5490000, 0x00002aaadff40000, 0x00002aaadff40000)
  object space 699072K, 100% used [0x00002aaab5490000,0x00002aaadff40000,0x00002aaadff40000)
 PSPermGen       total 21248K, used 9252K [0x00002aaab0090000, 0x00002aaab1550000, 0x00002aaab5490000)
  object space 21248K, 43% used [0x00002aaab0090000,0x00002aaab09993e8,0x00002aaab1550000)

2 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:1)

并非所有Throwable都是例外。您的错误记录代码是否捕获错误(OutOfMemoryError,StackOverflowError等)?

答案 1 :(得分:0)

另外两种可能性:

  • 可能会在不记录异常的工作线程上抛出异常。您可以使用Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler(...)解决此问题。

  • 抛出的异常可能会覆盖Throwable.fillInStackTrace()方法。 (这是一个长镜头......但显然有些人在误导性的尝试中阻止逆向工程。)

相关问题