分组不分组?

时间:2015-05-22 21:36:30

标签: sql postgresql group-by aggregate-functions postgresql-9.3

假设我正在尝试建立一个民意调查应用程序,这样我就可以创建一个民意调查模板,给它多个部分/问题,将多个人分配到给定问题的不同副本,创建不同的度量(愉快) ,成功,绿色)并分配不同的问题,以适用于所有这些措施。

像这样:

CREATE TABLE users (
  id SERIAL NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY
);

CREATE TABLE opinion_poll_templates (
  id SERIAL NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY
);

CREATE TABLE opinion_poll_instances (
  id SERIAL NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
  template_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES opinion_poll_templates(id)
);

CREATE TABLE section_templates (
  id SERIAL NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
  opinion_poll_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES opinion_poll_templates(id)
);

CREATE TABLE section_instances (
  id SERIAL NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
  opinion_poll_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES opinion_poll_instances(id),
  template_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES section_templates(id)
);

CREATE TABLE question_templates (
  id SERIAL NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
  section_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES section_templates(id)
);

CREATE TABLE measure_templates (
  id SERIAL NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
  opinion_poll_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES opinion_poll_templates(id)
);

CREATE TABLE answer_options (
  id SERIAL NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
  question_template_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES question_templates(id),
  weight FLOAT8
);

CREATE TABLE question_instances (
  id SERIAL NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
  template_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES question_templates(id),
  opinion_poll_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES opinion_poll_instances(id),
  section_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES section_instances(id),
  answer_option_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES answer_options(id),
  contributor_id INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE measure_instances (
  id SERIAL NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
  opinion_poll_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES opinion_poll_instances(id),
  template_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES measure_templates(id),
  total_score INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE scores (
  id SERIAL NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
  question_template_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES question_templates(id),
  measure_template_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES measure_templates(id),
  score INTEGER NOT NULL
);

现在假设我对每个measureInstance(分配给民意调查的每个度量)交叉问题,跨用户平均值感兴趣吗?

WITH weighted_score AS (
  SELECT AVG(answer_options.weight), measure_instances.id
  FROM question_instances
  INNER JOIN answer_options ON question_instances.template_id = answer_options.question_template_id
  INNER JOIN scores ON question_instances.template_id = scores.question_template_id
  INNER JOIN measure_instances ON measure_instances.template_id=scores.measure_template_id
  WHERE measure_instances.opinion_poll_id = question_instances.opinion_poll_id
  GROUP BY measure_instances.id
)
UPDATE measure_instances
SET total_score=(SELECT avg FROM weighted_score
WHERE weighted_score.id = measure_instances.id)*100
RETURNING total_score;

这似乎不仅没有按预期进行分组,而且产生了错误的结果。

为什么结果是整数而不是浮点数?为什么结果不是按度量实例分组而是在所有内容中相同? 为什么结果不正确呢?

演示:http://sqlfiddle.com/#!15/dcce8/1

编辑:在通过解释我想要的内容时,我意识到我的问题的根源是我只是添加了百分比,而不是按百分比对问题进行规范化。

我新的和改进的sql是:

WITH per_question_percentage AS (  
  SELECT SUM(answer_options.weight)/COUNT(question_instances.id) percentage, question_templates.id qid, opinion_poll_instances.id oid
  FROM question_instances
  INNER JOIN answer_options ON question_instances.answer_option_id = answer_options.id
  INNER JOIN question_templates ON question_templates.id = question_instances.template_id
  INNER JOIN opinion_poll_instances ON opinion_poll_instances.id = question_instances.opinion_poll_id
  GROUP BY question_templates.id, opinion_poll_instances.id
), max_per_measure AS (
  SELECT SUM(scores.score), measure_instances.id mid, measure_instances.opinion_poll_id oid
  FROM measure_instances
  INNER JOIN scores ON scores.measure_template_id=measure_instances.template_id
  GROUP BY measure_instances.id, measure_instances.opinion_poll_id
), per_measure_per_opinion_poll AS (
  SELECT per_question_percentage.percentage * scores.score score, measure_instances.id mid, measure_instances.opinion_poll_id oid
  FROM question_instances
  INNER JOIN scores ON question_instances.template_id = scores.question_template_id
  INNER JOIN measure_instances ON measure_instances.template_id = scores.measure_template_id
  INNER JOIN max_per_measure ON measure_instances.id = max_per_measure.mid
  INNER JOIN per_question_percentage ON per_question_percentage.qid = question_instances.template_id
  WHERE measure_instances.opinion_poll_id = question_instances.opinion_poll_id AND question_instances.opinion_poll_id = per_question_percentage.oid
  GROUP BY measure_instances.id, measure_instances.opinion_poll_id, per_question_percentage.percentage, scores.score
) 
UPDATE measure_instances
SET total_score = subquery.result*100
FROM (SELECT SUM(per_measure_per_opinion_poll.score)/max_per_measure.sum result, per_measure_per_opinion_poll.mid, per_measure_per_opinion_poll.oid
      FROM  max_per_measure, per_measure_per_opinion_poll
      WHERE per_measure_per_opinion_poll.mid = max_per_measure.mid 
      AND per_measure_per_opinion_poll.oid = max_per_measure.oid
      GROUP BY max_per_measure.sum, per_measure_per_opinion_poll.mid, per_measure_per_opinion_poll.oid)
      AS subquery(result, mid, oid)
WHERE measure_instances.id = subquery.mid
AND measure_instances.opinion_poll_id = subquery.oid
RETURNING total_score;

这是规范的SQL吗?这种CTE链接(或其他方式)有什么我应该注意的吗?是否有更有效的方法来实现同样的目标?

2 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:1)

评论时间有点长。

我不明白这些问题。

为什么结果是整数而不是浮点数?

因为measure_instances.total_score是一个整数,而且是returning子句返回的内容。

为什么结果不按度量实例分组而是在所有内容中相同?

当我独立运行CTE时,值为0.45。数据和逻辑决定了相同的值。

为什么结果不正确?

我认为你的意思是"对于他们所有人而言#34;。在任何情况下,结果对我来说都是正确的。

答案 1 :(得分:1)

如果您针对演示中的数据运行此查询:

SELECT 
    answer_options.weight, measure_instances.id
FROM 
    question_instances
INNER JOIN 
    answer_options ON question_instances.template_id = answer_options.question_template_id
INNER JOIN 
    scores ON question_instances.template_id = scores.question_template_id
INNER JOIN 
    measure_instances ON measure_instances.template_id=scores.measure_template_id
WHERE 
    measure_instances.opinion_poll_id = question_instances.opinion_poll_id
ORDER BY
    2;

你会得到:

| weight | id |
|--------|----|
|    0.5 |  1 |
|   0.25 |  1 |
|   0.25 |  1 |
|   0.75 |  1 |
|    0.5 |  1 |
|   0.75 |  2 |
|    0.5 |  2 |
|   0.25 |  2 |
|    0.5 |  2 |
|   0.25 |  2 |

如果您手动计算平均值,您将得到:

对于 id = 1 ==> 0.5 + 0.25 + 0.25 + 0.75 + 0.5 = 2.25 ==> 2.25 / 5 = 0.45
对于 id = 2 ==> 0.75 + 0.5 + 0.25 + 0.5 + 0.25 = 2.25 ==> 2.25 / 5 = 0.45

在我看来,这个查询工作正常。

请解释为什么这些结果对您不利,您希望从上述数据和查询中获得什么?

相关问题