为什么STL的排序功能不起作用?

时间:2015-06-21 14:04:40

标签: c++ c++11 stl

一组数字将作为输入传递。此外,数字0-9以升序重新定义的关系将作为输入传递。根据重新定义的关系,必须按升序列出这组数字。 样本I / O

输入:

20 50 11 121

9231476058

输出:

50 11 20 121

我写的程序有一个我不知道的错误。所以,请帮我调试一下。

计划规范:

1。)我创建了一个邻接列表,用于根据数字位数对数字进行分组(50 11 20分组在索引2处,121在索引3处分组)

2.)为了对它们进行排序,我使用了标准模板库排序功能。我已通过以下参数

list<int> *lst=new list<int>[10];       //adjacency list

void sortg(list<int> *lst,int *arr1)
{
    static int *arr=arr1;
    struct fnct
    {
        int digi;

        fnct(int digi)
        {
            this->digi=digi;
        }
        bool operator()(int val1,int val2)
        {
            while(digi>0)  // is the number of digits of the passed arguments
            {
                //logic for sorting. here i have used local arry "*arr" which i
                //have declared static
            }
        }
    };

    for(int con=9;con>=0;--con)      //count for the rows of adjacency list
    {
        if( (*(lst+con)).size()>0 )     // for finding out a valid list
        {
            sort((lst+con)->begin(),(lst+con)->end(),fnct(con));

        }
    }
}

我得到的错误是:

In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.9/algorithm:62:0,from prog.cpp:5:
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_algo.h: In instantiation of 'void
std::__sort(_RandomAccessIterator, _RandomAccessIterator, _Compare) [with
_RandomAccessIterator = std::_List_iterator<int>; _Compare =                  
__gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_comp_iter<sortg(std::list<int>*, int*)::fnct>]':
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_algo.h:4716:78:   required from 'void              

std::sort(_RAIter, _RAIter, _Compare) [with _RAIter =   

std::_List_iterator<int>;    _Compare = sortg(std::list<int>*, int*)::fnct]'
prog.cpp:124:63:   required from here
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_algo.h:1968:22: error: no match for       'operator-  

'    (operand types are 'std::_List_iterator<int>' and   

'std::_List_iterator<int>')
 std::__lg(__last - __first)     

*2,/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_algo.h:1968:22: note:      

'std::_List_iterator<int>' is not derived from 'const    

std::move_iterator<_Iterator>'
 std::__lg(__last - __first) * 2,


                 "Lines are removed from here"
                  ^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.9/vector:65:0,
             from /usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/random.h:34,
             from /usr/include/c++/4.9/random:49,
             from /usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_algo.h:66,
             from /usr/include/c++/4.9/algorithm:62,
             from prog.cpp:5:
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_bvector.h:208:3: note: std::ptrdiff_t   std::operator-(const std::_Bit_iterator_base&, const std::_Bit_iterator_base&)
operator-(const _Bit_iterator_base& __x, const _Bit_iterator_base& __y)
^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_bvector.h:208:3: 

note:no known conversion for argument 1 from 'std::_List_iterator<int>' to   
'const std::_Bit_iterator_base&'

由于这个错误很长,我已经删除了它之间的一些行

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:1)

行中的错误

 sort((lst+con)->begin(),(lst+con)->end(),fnct(con));

 In instantiation of 'void
std::__sort(_RandomAccessIterator, _RandomAccessIterator, _Compare) [with
_RandomAccessIterator = std::_List_iterator<int>; _Compare =                  
__gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_comp_iter<sortg(std::list<int>*, int*)::fnct>]'

现在,List被构建为双向链表(因此在两个方向上进行迭代),其主要特征是支持恒定时间插入和擦除操作。但随机访问?没有。

因此,错误消息表明sort需要RandomAccessIterator哪个List Iterator不是(它是双向迭代器,预期列表被实现为双向链表)。

因此,使用成员函数排序来执行此操作。

(*(lst+con).)sort(fnct(con));  // Use it as appropriate