两个不同算法的计数器阵列的结果相同

时间:2016-10-31 18:09:26

标签: java arrays algorithm breadth-first-search depth-first-search

我正在尝试建立一个程序,比较15个游戏中算法BFS,DFS,A *(有两个启发式)的笔画数。

我的计数器对BFS和DFS的两个计数器阵列以及两个A *计数相同的结果。然而,我实际上正在使用来自main(类Project)的四个不同数组,并且我为这些笔划分配了四个不同的变量。

在我看来,不正确的代码部分是一个while循环,它尽可能地探索顶点的子(对于BFS)或发现每个后续节点(对于BFS)。最重要的区别是代码的最后一行,它是frontier.push(child);,对于DFS或frontier.add(child);对于BFS。

每次进入循环时,笔画数都会递增

number_of_strokes_DFS+=1;

number_of_strokes_BFS+=1;

当我们找到最终状态时,我们将结果添加到笔画数的数组中:

array_number_of_strokes_dfs.add(number_of_strokes_DFS);

array_number_of_strokes_bfs.add(number_of_strokes_BFS);

最后是有罪的代码(实际上只有DFS,就BFS来说,除了最后一行之外真的很相似)。

 while(!frontier.isEmpty()){
        number_of_strokes_DFS+=1;
     if(System.currentTimeMillis()-startTime>10000)break;
     // We remove the current state from the frontier
     current_state = frontier.pop();
     // We get all possible actions from the current state
     actions = current_state.getActions();
     // We add the current state to already explored nodes
     explored_nodes.add(current_state);
     //System.out.println(current_state);
     path.add(current_state);

     // we found the goal
     if(goal_test(current_state)){
         /*for(State visited :path){
         System.out.println(visited);
     }*/
            array_number_of_strokes_dfs.add(number_of_strokes_DFS);
         System.out.println("nombres de coups DFS"+number_of_strokes_DFS);
         number_of_strokes_DFS=0;
         return current_state;
     }

     // We create every child
     for (Action action : actions){
         //System.out.println("action : " + action);
         // we get a child from the execution of the current_state
         State child = current_state.execute(action);
         //System.out.println("we executed the action");
         if(!explored_nodes.contains(child)&&!frontier.contains(child)){
             // This child not being already explored nor int the frontier we add it to the last one
             frontier.push(child);
         }
     }

 }
    array_number_of_strokes_dfs.add(-1);

    return finalState;

}

这就是实际问题,因为当我让array_number_of_strokes_dfs.add(number_of_strokes_DFS);,例如,我总是得到与数组中的BFS相同的结果。它可能会发生一次,但不是每次都发生! 而如果我加零

array_number_of_strokes_dfs.add(0);

我确实看到了差异......

你有什么想法吗?

结果如下:

strokes BFS : [3, 27, 27, 26, 26, 2631, 7]
strokes DFS[3, 27, 27, 26, 26, 2631, 7]

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:2)

如果public class StartActivity extends AppCompatActivity { @Override protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.activity_start); AuthController.initAuth(new ResultListener<AuthController>() { @Override public void onResult(AuthController authController) { Intent intent; if ( authController.getUser() != null ) { intent = new Intent(getApplicationContext(), MainNavigationActivity.class); } else { intent = new Intent(getApplicationContext(), LoginActivity.class); } startActivity(intent); finish(); } }); } } public class AuthController { private static AuthController authController; private User user; public User getUser() { return user; } public static AuthController getInstance() { if (authController == null) { throw new IllegalStateException("The auth system is not initializet. Restart the app."); } return authController; } public static void initAuth(final ResultListener<AuthController> authListener) { final AuthController authController = new AuthController(); FirebaseAuth mAuth = FirebaseAuth.getInstance(); mAuth.addAuthStateListener(new FirebaseAuth.AuthStateListener() { @Override public void onAuthStateChanged(@NonNull FirebaseAuth firebaseAuth) { final FirebaseUser authUser = firebaseAuth.getCurrentUser(); if (authUser != null) { String authUserId = authUser.getUid(); FirebaseDatabase firebaseDatabase = FirebaseDatabase.getInstance(); firebaseDatabase.getReference("users").child(authUserId).addListenerForSingleValueEvent(new ValueEventListener() { @Override public void onDataChange(DataSnapshot dataSnapshot) { authController.user = dataSnapshot.getValue(User.class); AuthController.authController = authController; authListener.onResult(authController); } @Override public void onCancelled(DatabaseError databaseError) { authController.user = null; AuthController.authController = authController; authListener.onResult(authController); } }); } else { authController.user = null; AuthController.authController = authController; authListener.onResult(authController); } } }); } } frontier或类似内容,则Stackadd类似,因此您的push实际上也在做深度 - 第一次搜索。如果你真的想在开头插入(如果你在每次迭代时BFS元素想要做什么),你想要调用pop(注意.add(0, elem) - 索引at要插入的,而不是0,以便它实际上插入到开头。

相关问题