无论如何我可以使用如果否则在ruby case..end中

时间:2016-11-10 21:12:59

标签: ruby switch-statement

case search_term
when 'a'
  ptr = 0
when 'b'
  ptr = 1
when 'c' 
  ptr = 2
else
  ptr = 99
end

if location = 'xyz' and search_term = 'c'
ptr = 0
end

有没有办法在case语句中包含if??

5 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:4)

ptr = case search_term
when 'a'
   0
when 'b'
   1
when 'c' 
  if location == 'xyz' then  #note the ==
    0 
  else 
    2
  end 
else
  99
end

答案 1 :(得分:3)

case构造通常不用于复杂逻辑。虽然您可以找到一个可行的解决方案(如@steenslag的答案),但这条路径会因条件变得更复杂而导致麻烦。具有三个或四个分支的case语句是可行的,但已经有点代码味道。不仅如此,还会产生问题。将条件放在when分支中会使问题复杂化。

您可以考虑使用小方法将事情分解为单独的职责。这将使您的代码在将来更容易理解,扩展和修改。

def pointer # Ruby convention is to use real words where practical
  special_condition? ? 0 : pointer_base
end

def special_condition?
  location == 'xyz' && search_term == 'c'
end

def pointer_base
  search_term_map[search_term] || 99
end

def search_term_map
  ('a'..'c').zip(0..2).to_h # This could just as easily be ('a'..'z').zip(0..25).to_h
end

答案 2 :(得分:0)

您可以在when子句中使用三元运算符:

case search_term
when 'a'
  ptr = 0
when 'b'
  ptr = 1
when 'c' 
  ptr = location == 'xyz' ? 0 : 2
else
  ptr = 99
end

两个评论:

  • 请参阅==进行比较(=是作业)

答案 3 :(得分:0)

这是另一种可能性:

ptr = (location == 'xyz') ? 0 : 2

不需要括号,但我发现它更具可读性。

答案 4 :(得分:0)

如果我简洁地写作,我会使用:

ptr = case search_term
      when 'a'
        0
      when 'b'
        1
      when 'c' 
        location == 'xyz' ? 0 : 2
      else
        99
      end

虽然许多语言允许使用三元语句,但并不是真的值得推荐,主要是因为太多人不了解如何使用它们,或者安全/可维护地使用它们。

或者可以这样写:

ptr = case search_term
      when 'a'
        0
      when 'b'
        1
      when 'c' 
        if location == 'xyz' 
          0 
        else
          2
        end
      else
        99
      end

如果您真的想玩得开心,可以利用Hash.new的功能返回默认值:

Hash.new(99).merge(
  'a' => 0,
  'b' => 1,
  'c' => location == 'xyz' ? 0 : 2
)[search_term] 

测试它们:

search_term = 'a'
location = 'xyz'

ptr = case search_term
      when 'a'
        0
      when 'b'
        1
      when 'c' 
        if location == 'xyz' 
          0 
        else
          2
        end
      else
        99
      end
ptr  # => 0

Hash.new(99).merge(
  'a' => 0,
  'b' => 1,
  'c' => location == 'xyz' ? 0 : 2
)[search_term]  # => 0
search_term = 'b'
location = 'xyz'

ptr = case search_term
      when 'a'
        0
      when 'b'
        1
      when 'c' 
        if location == 'xyz' 
          0 
        else
          2
        end
      else
        99
      end
ptr  # => 1

Hash.new(99).merge(
  'a' => 0,
  'b' => 1,
  'c' => location == 'xyz' ? 0 : 2
)[search_term]  # => 1
search_term = 'c'
location = 'xyz'

ptr = case search_term
      when 'a'
        0
      when 'b'
        1
      when 'c' 
        if location == 'xyz' 
          0 
        else
          2
        end
      else
        99
      end
ptr  # => 0

Hash.new(99).merge(
  'a' => 0,
  'b' => 1,
  'c' => location == 'xyz' ? 0 : 2
)[search_term]  # => 0
search_term = 'c'
location = 'abc'

ptr = case search_term
      when 'a'
        0
      when 'b'
        1
      when 'c' 
        if location == 'xyz' 
          0 
        else
          2
        end
      else
        99
      end
ptr  # => 2

Hash.new(99).merge(
  'a' => 0,
  'b' => 1,
  'c' => location == 'xyz' ? 0 : 2
)[search_term]  # => 2
search_term = 'z'
location = 'xyz'

ptr = case search_term
      when 'a'
        0
      when 'b'
        1
      when 'c' 
        if location == 'xyz' 
          0 
        else
          2
        end
      else
        99
      end
ptr  # => 99

Hash.new(99).merge(
  'a' => 0,
  'b' => 1,
  'c' => location == 'xyz' ? 0 : 2
)[search_term]  # => 99

如果您没有长时间循环或迭代search_term的很多值,或者没有很多键/值对,那么动态定义哈希是可以的。合并。通常我会使用第一种风格来定义它。

相关问题