试图改善Julia代码的执行时间

时间:2017-01-24 18:26:18

标签: octave julia grammar

我需要编写一个代码,使用只有一条规则的语法生成一个字符串。例如,如果规则是" G - > [G + G]",我们将规则应用于" G",结果是字符串" [G + G]&#34 ;;如果我们将它应用于先前的结果,我们得到" [[G + G] + [G + G]]"等等。换句话说,它是关于重写公理(规则的左侧)给定次数, 遵循规则。

我已经获得了一个用Octave编写的代码来实现这个操作(我不会包含代码,因为它有点长,但如果有必要的话我会的。理解或回答问题)。我需要做的是在Julia中编写一个等效的函数;所以我写了这个

    function generate_developedstring(axiom::ASCIIString, genome::ASCIIString, iterations::Int8)
        tic()
        developedstring = axiom
        for i=1:iterations
            developedstring = replace(developedstring, axiom, genome)
        end
        toc()
        return developedstring
    end

在我之前写的例子中,公理将是" G"和基因组" [G + G]"。

根据发布的基准时间是julialang.org,Julia应该比Octave更快,但在这种情况下,Octave的速度是Julia的两倍 (我对两个代码使用相同的公理,基因组和迭代,并使用tic toc函数测量时间)。

有没有办法让Julia代码更快?

编辑:首先,非常感谢你的评论。我将向您展示我已经给出的Octave代码(我没有写过):

function axiom = ls(genome)
  tic
  ProductionSystem = ['[=>[ ]=>] +=>+ -=>- G=>',genome];
  rule = extract(ProductionSystem);

  n_Rules = length(rule);

  % starting string
  axiom = 'G';

  % iterations (choose only from 1 to 7, >= 8 critical,
  % depends on the string and on the computer !!
  n_Repeats = 3;

%CALCULATE THE STRING
%=================================

for i = 1:n_Repeats
    % a single letter (axiom)
    axiomINcells = cellstr(axiom);
    for j = 1:n_Rules
        % find all occurrences of that axiom
        hit = strfind(axiom, rule(j).pre);
        if (length(hit) >= 1)
            for k = hit
                % perform the rule
                % (replace 'pre' by 'post')
                axiomINcells{k} = rule(j).pos;
            end
        end
    end
    axiom = [];
    for j = 1:length(axiomINcells)
        % put all strings together
        axiom = [axiom, axiomINcells{j}];
    end
end
toc

function rule = extract(ProductionSystem)
% rules are separated by space character, and pre and post sides are
% separtated by '->'
% e.g. F->FF G->F[+G][-G]F[+G][-G]FG

i=0;
while (~isempty(ProductionSystem))
    i=i+1;
    [rule1,ProductionSystem] = strtok(ProductionSystem,' ');
    [rule(i).pre,post] = strtok(rule1,'=>');
    rule(i).pos = post(3:end);
    if (~isempty(ProductionSystem)) ProductionSystem=ProductionSystem(2:end);   % delete separator
    end
end

关于我使用的Julia版本,它是0.4.7。你还问我运行速度有多快;我只需要尽可能快地编写代码,而Octave更快的事实让我觉得我做错了。 再次感谢你。

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:3)

您可以指定genome作为规则而不是模式吗?我的意思是,例如genome = ax -> "[$ax,$ax]"

比较这两个实现,第一个与你的实现相同:

function genstring(axiom::String, genome::String, iter::Int)
    str = axiom
    for i in 1:iter
        str = replace(str, axiom, genome)
    end
    return str
end

然后使用匿名函数:

genome = ax -> "[$ax,$ax]"

function genstring_(axiom::String, genome, n::Int)
    if n < 1
        return axiom
    end
    return genstring_(genome(axiom), genome, n-1)
end

在版本0.5上,使用BenchmarkTools

julia> @benchmark genstring("G", "[G,G]", 2)
BenchmarkTools.Trial: 
  memory estimate:  752.00 bytes
  allocs estimate:  15
  --------------
  minimum time:     745.950 ns (0.00% GC)
  median time:      801.067 ns (0.00% GC)
  mean time:        1.006 μs (14.30% GC)
  maximum time:     50.271 μs (96.63% GC)
  --------------
  samples:          10000
  evals/sample:     119
  time tolerance:   5.00%
  memory tolerance: 1.00%

julia> @benchmark genstring_("G", genome, 2)
BenchmarkTools.Trial: 
  memory estimate:  352.00 bytes
  allocs estimate:  9
  --------------
  minimum time:     397.562 ns (0.00% GC)
  median time:      414.149 ns (0.00% GC)
  mean time:        496.511 ns (13.06% GC)
  maximum time:     24.410 μs (97.18% GC)
  --------------
  samples:          10000
  evals/sample:     201
  time tolerance:   5.00%
  memory tolerance: 1.00%

它更好地扩展:

julia> @benchmark genstring("G", "[G,G]", 10)
BenchmarkTools.Trial: 
  memory estimate:  18.00 kb
  allocs estimate:  71
  --------------
  minimum time:     93.569 μs (0.00% GC)
  median time:      95.959 μs (0.00% GC)
  mean time:        103.429 μs (3.05% GC)
  maximum time:     4.216 ms (97.14% GC)
  --------------
  samples:          10000
  evals/sample:     1
  time tolerance:   5.00%
  memory tolerance: 1.00%

julia> @benchmark genstring_("G", genome, 10)
BenchmarkTools.Trial: 
  memory estimate:  14.13 kb
  allocs estimate:  49
  --------------
  minimum time:     3.072 μs (0.00% GC)
  median time:      3.597 μs (0.00% GC)
  mean time:        5.703 μs (29.78% GC)
  maximum time:     441.515 μs (98.24% GC)
  --------------
  samples:          10000
  evals/sample:     8
  time tolerance:   5.00%
  memory tolerance: 1.00%

据我所知,字符串插值不是超快的,因此可以进一步优化。

相关问题