我正在为两个列表的主地址相等的每个列表项设置id。
服务器POJO
public class Server {
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
@Column(name="id")
public Integer id;
@OneToMany (mappedBy = "server",cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
private List<IPAddress> ipaddresses;
public Integer getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Integer id) {
this.id = id;
}
public void setIpaddresses(List<IPAddress> ipaddresses) {
this.ipaddresses = ipaddresses;
}
public List<IPAddress> getIpaddresses() {
return ipaddresses;
}
}
IPAddress POJO
public class IPAddress {
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
@Column(name="ID")
public Integer id;
@Column(name="ipaddress")
private String ipaddress;
@Column(name="primaryIP")
private boolean primary;
@ManyToOne
@JsonIgnore
@JoinColumn(name = "server_id")
private Server server;
public Integer getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Integer id) {
this.id = id;
}
public String getIpaddress() {
return ipaddress;
}
public void setIpaddress(String ipaddress) {
this.ipaddress = ipaddress;
}
public boolean isPrimary() {
return primary;
}
public void setPrimary(boolean primary) {
this.primary = primary;
}
public Server getServer() {
return server;
}
public void setServer(Server server) {
this.server = server;
}
}
这是替换重复项的逻辑。
注意::currServerList是数据库和importServerList中的一个列表,我正在将服务器导入到db中,因此当我替换currServerList我要更新服务器(用importServerList替换)时,importServerList将不具有ID重复。
Set<String> primaryIpAddresses = importServerList.stream()
.map(Server::getPrimaryIpAddress)
.collect(Collectors.toSet());
Set<Integer> currServerId = currServerList.stream()
.filter(s->primaryIpAddresses.contains(s.getPrimaryIpAddress()))
.map(Server::getId)
.collect(Collectors.toSet());
List<Server> filteredList=currServerList.stream()
.filter(s->!primaryIpAddresses.contains(s.getPrimaryIpAddress()))
.collect(Collectors.toList());
filteredList.addAll(importServerList);
filteredList.stream().filter(s->primaryIpAddresses.contains(s.getPrimaryIpAddress())).forEach(s->s.setId(currServerList.stream().filter(server->currServerId.contains(server.getId())).mapToInt(Server::getId)));
这是我的逻辑,但是如何将此Stream转换为我尝试过的IntStream 但不起作用 filteredList.stream()。filter(s-> primaryIpAddresses.contains(s.getPrimaryIpAddress()))。forEach(s-> s.setId(currServerList.stream()。filter(server-> currServerId.contains( server.getId()))。mapToInt(Server :: getId))); 编译器错误:服务器类型中的方法setId(Integer)不适用于参数(IntStream)
仍然无法使用,因为我没有将id设置为相等的位置
已更新:
filteredList.stream().filter(s->currListPrimaryIpAddress.contains(s.getPrimaryIpAddress()))
.forEach(srv -> srv.setId(currServerList.stream().filter(server->primaryIpAddresses.contains(server.getPrimaryIpAddress()))
.findFirst()
.get().getId()));
答案中的先前代码为所有服务器设置了相同的ID,但是我尝试不使用像这样的简单for-each循环进行功能编程
for(Server srv : filteredList) {
for(Server dbsrv : currServerList) {
logger.debug("dbsrv ipadd --> " + dbsrv.getPrimaryIpAddress());
logger.debug("impsrv ipadd --> " + srv.getPrimaryIpAddress());
if(dbsrv.getPrimaryIpAddress()!= null && dbsrv.getPrimaryIpAddress().equals(srv.getPrimaryIpAddress())) {
srv.setId(dbsrv.getId());
logger.debug("in setting server id");
break;
}
}
}
现在必须检查null,因为它会在那一行引发异常,因为db中有一些数据是错误的,因此我正在做防御性编码,但是现在我需要在上面编写相同的内容使用功能编程编写代码。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
更改
s->s.setId(currServerList
.stream()
.filter(server->currServerId.contains(server.getId()))
.mapToInt(Server::getId)
到
s->s.setId(currServerList.stream()
.filter(server->currServerId.contains(server.getId()))
.mapToInt(Server::getId)
.findFirst()
.orElse(0)
答案是假设.filter(server->currServerId.contains(server.getId()))
不匹配任何内容,则默认情况下返回0。
您可以将其更改为适合您的默认值。