numba cuda无法通过+ =产生正确的结果(需要减少gpu吗?)

时间:2018-12-12 14:54:30

标签: cuda numba gpu-programming reduction

我正在使用numba cuda来计算函数。

代码只是将所有值加到一个结果中,但是numba cuda给我的结果不同于numpy。

数字代码

 import math
 def numba_example(number_of_maximum_loop,gs,ts,bs):
        from numba import cuda
        result = cuda.device_array([3,])

        @cuda.jit(device=True)

    def BesselJ0(x):
        return math.sqrt(2/math.pi/x)

    @cuda.jit
    def cuda_kernel(number_of_maximum_loop,result,gs,ts,bs):
        i = cuda.grid(1)
        if i < number_of_maximum_loop:
            result[0] += BesselJ0(i/100+gs)
            result[1] += BesselJ0(i/100+ts)
            result[2] += BesselJ0(i/100+bs)

    # Configure the blocks
    threadsperblock = 128
    blockspergrid = (number_of_maximum_loop + (threadsperblock - 1)) // threadsperblock

    # Start the kernel 
    cuda_kernel[blockspergrid, threadsperblock](number_of_maximum_loop,result,gs,ts,bs) 

    return result.copy_to_host()

numba_example(1000,20,20,20) 

输出:

array([ 0.17770302,  0.34166728,  0.35132036])

numpy代码

import math
def numpy_example(number_of_maximum_loop,gs,ts,bs):
    import numpy as np
    result = np.zeros([3,])

    def BesselJ0(x):
        return math.sqrt(2/math.pi/x)

    for i in range(number_of_maximum_loop):
        result[0] += BesselJ0(i/100+gs)
        result[1] += BesselJ0(i/100+ts)
        result[2] += BesselJ0(i/100+bs)

    return result

numpy_example(1000,20,20,20) 

输出:

array([ 160.40546935,  160.40546935,  160.40546935])

我不知道我在哪里错。我想我可能会减少。但是用一个cuda内核完成它似乎是不可能的。

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:2)

是的,需要适当的并行归约来将来自多个GPU线程的数据求和到单个变量。

这是一个如何从单个内核完成该操作的简单示例:

$ cat t23.py
import math
def numba_example(number_of_maximum_loop,gs,ts,bs):
    from numba import cuda
    result = cuda.device_array([3,])

    @cuda.jit(device=True)
    def BesselJ0(x):
        return math.sqrt(2/math.pi/x)

    @cuda.jit
    def cuda_kernel(number_of_maximum_loop,result,gs,ts,bs):
        i = cuda.grid(1)
        if i < number_of_maximum_loop:
            cuda.atomic.add(result, 0, BesselJ0(i/100+gs))
            cuda.atomic.add(result, 1, BesselJ0(i/100+ts))
            cuda.atomic.add(result, 2, BesselJ0(i/100+bs))

# Configure the blocks
    threadsperblock = 128
    blockspergrid = (number_of_maximum_loop + (threadsperblock - 1)) // threadsperblock

 # Start the kernel
    init = [0.0,0.0,0.0]
    result = cuda.to_device(init)
    cuda_kernel[blockspergrid, threadsperblock](number_of_maximum_loop,result,gs,ts,bs)

    return result.copy_to_host()

print(numba_example(1000,20,20,20))
$ python t23.py
[ 162.04299487  162.04299487  162.04299487]
$

您也可以按照here所述,使用reduce装饰器直接适当地减少numba,尽管我不确定可以在单个内核中以这种方式减少3次。

最后,您可以使用numba cuda编写一个普通的cuda并行约简,如here所示。我认为将其扩展到在单个内核中执行3个约简并不难。

这3种不同的方法当然可能会有性能差异。

顺便说一句,如果您想知道我上面的代码与问题中的python代码之间的结果差异,我将无法解释。当我运行您的python代码时,得到的结果与我的答案中的numba cuda代码匹配:

$ cat t24.py
import math
def numpy_example(number_of_maximum_loop,gs,ts,bs):
    import numpy as np
    result = np.zeros([3,])

    def BesselJ0(x):
        return math.sqrt(2/math.pi/x)

    for i in range(number_of_maximum_loop):
        result[0] += BesselJ0(i/100+gs)
        result[1] += BesselJ0(i/100+ts)
        result[2] += BesselJ0(i/100+bs)

    return result

print(numpy_example(1000,20,20,20))
$ python t24.py
[ 162.04299487  162.04299487  162.04299487]
$
相关问题