Debezium无法快照大表大小

时间：2019-04-24 22:16:46

标签： apache-kafka apache-kafka-connect debezium

我想我可能错过了一些配置，但是我们正在尝试使用Debezium对具有大约800万条记录的表中的所有行进行快照，并在一段时间后将其停止。

连接器配置为：

{
   "connector.class":"io.debezium.connector.mysql.MySqlConnector",
   "database.user":"MyUser",
   "database.server.id":"12345",
   "tasks.max":"1",
   "database.history.kafka.bootstrap.servers":"MyKafka:9092",
   "database.history.kafka.topic":"MyConnectorHistory",
   "database.server.name":"MyDbName",
   "database.port":"3306",
   "table.whitelist":"BigTable",
   "decimal.handling.mode":"double",
   "database.hostname":"***",
   "database.password":"***",
   "name":"MyConnector",
   "database.whitelist":"MyDb",
   "snapshot.mode":"initial_only",
   "connect.timeout.ms":"60000"
}

连接器开始扫描行：

  April 24th 2019, 13:06:52.573 2019-04-24 16:06:52,569 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 9: - 2040000 of 8609643 rows scanned from table 'MyDb.BigTable' after 00:59:29.129   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
  ... other prints
  April 24th 2019, 12:17:28.448 2019-04-24 15:17:28,447 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 9: - 50000 of 8609643 rows scanned from table 'MyDb.BigTable' after 00:10:05.008   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:43.183   2019-04-24 15:07:43,183 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 9: - 40000 of 8609643 rows scanned from table 'MyDb.BigTable' after 00:00:19.744   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:36.499   2019-04-24 15:07:36,498 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 9: - 30000 of 8609643 rows scanned from table 'MyDb.BigTable' after 00:00:13.059   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:30.157   2019-04-24 15:07:30,157 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 9: - 20000 of 8609643 rows scanned from table 'MyDb.BigTable' after 00:00:06.718   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:25.116   2019-04-24 15:07:25,116 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 9: - 10000 of 8609643 rows scanned from table 'MyDb.BigTable' after 00:00:01.677   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:23.439   2019-04-24 15:07:23,439 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 9: - scanning table 'MyDb.BigTable' (1 of 10 tables)   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:23.427   2019-04-24 15:07:23,427 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 8: tables were locked explicitly, but to get a consistent snapshot we cannot release the locks until we've read all tables.   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:23.427   2019-04-24 15:07:23,427 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 9: scanning contents of 10 tables while still in transaction   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:23.143   2019-04-24 15:07:23,143 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 7: generating DROP and CREATE statements to reflect current database schemas:   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:23.142   2019-04-24 15:07:23,142 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 6: read binlog position of MySQL master   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:22.739   2019-04-24 15:07:22,739 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 5: flush and obtain read lock for 10 tables (preventing writes)   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:22.635   2019-04-24 15:07:22,635 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 4: read list of available tables in each database   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:22.633   2019-04-24 15:07:22,633 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 3: read list of available databases   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:22.632   2019-04-24 15:07:22,632 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 2: start transaction with consistent snapshot   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:22.632   2019-04-24 15:07:22,631 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 1: unable to flush and acquire global read lock, will use table read locks after reading table names   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]
    April 24th 2019, 12:07:22.617   2019-04-24 15:07:22,617 INFO   MySQL|MyDbName|snapshot  Step 1: flush and obtain global read lock to prevent writes to database   [io.debezium.connector.mysql.SnapshotReader]

然后一段时间后，我们得到

    Failed to flush, timed out while waiting for producer to flush outstanding 4094 messages
    Failed to commit offsets   [org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.SourceTaskOffsetCommitter]

然后，扫描停止，并且我们多次尝试再次刷新提交偏移量：

  April 24th 2019, 12:34:08.641 2019-04-24 15:34:08,641 ERROR  ||  WorkerSourceTask{id=MyConnectorr-0} Failed to commit offsets   [org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.SourceTaskOffsetCommitter]
    April 24th 2019, 12:34:08.640   2019-04-24 15:34:08,640 ERROR  ||  WorkerSourceTask{id=MyConnectorr-0} Failed to flush, timed out while waiting for producer to flush outstanding 5560 messages   [org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerSourceTask]
    April 24th 2019, 12:33:18.640   2019-04-24 15:33:18,640 INFO   ||  WorkerSourceTask{id=MyConnectorr-0} Committing offsets   [org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerSourceTask]
    April 24th 2019, 12:33:18.640   2019-04-24 15:33:18,640 INFO   ||  WorkerSourceTask{id=MyConnectorr-0} flushing 5560 outstanding messages for offset commit   [org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerSourceTask]
    April 24th 2019, 12:32:18.640   2019-04-24 15:32:18,640 ERROR  ||  WorkerSourceTask{id=MyConnectorr-0} Failed to commit offsets   [org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.SourceTaskOffsetCommitter]
    April 24th 2019, 12:32:18.639   2019-04-24 15:32:18,639 ERROR  ||  WorkerSourceTask{id=MyConnectorr-0} Failed to flush, timed out while waiting for producer to flush outstanding 5560 messages   [org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerSourceTask]
    April 24th 2019, 12:31:28.639   2019-04-24 15:31:28,639 INFO   ||  WorkerSourceTask{id=MyConnectorr-0} Committing offsets   [org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerSourceTask]
    April 24th 2019, 12:31:28.639   2019-04-24 15:31:28,639 INFO   ||  WorkerSourceTask{id=MyConnectorr-0} flushing 5560 outstanding messages for offset commit   [org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerSourceTask]
    April 24th 2019, 12:30:28.639   2019-04-24 15:30:28,639 ERROR  ||  WorkerSourceTask{id=MyConnectorr-0} Failed to commit offsets   [org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.SourceTaskOffsetCommitter]
    April 24th 2019, 12:30:28.636   2019-04-24 15:30:28,635 ERROR  ||  WorkerSourceTask{id=MyConnectorr-0} Failed to flush, timed out while waiting for producer to flush outstanding 652 messages   [org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerSourceTask]
    April 24th 2019, 12:29:38.635   2019-04-24 15:29:38,635 INFO   ||  WorkerSourceTask{id=MyConnectorr-0} flushing 5556 outstanding messages for offset commit   [org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerSourceTask]
    April 24th 2019, 12:29:38.635   2019-04-24 15:29:38,635 INFO   ||  WorkerSourceTask{id=MyConnectorr-0} Committing offsets

经过一段时间（大约9到10分钟），它似乎成功，并再次开始扫描行。 但是一段时间之后，它又一次失败，然后，如果没有完成所有记录，连接器会将其状态更改为FAIL

其中一个错误是

{
   "name":"MyConnector",
   "connector":{
      "state":"RUNNING",
      "worker_id":"svc.cluster.local:8083"
   },
   "tasks":[
      {
         "state":"FAILED",
         "trace":"org.apache.kafka.connect.errors.ConnectException: OffsetStorageWriter is already flushing\n\tat org.apache.kafka.connect.storage.OffsetStorageWriter.beginFlush(OffsetStorageWriter.java:110)\n\tat org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerSourceTask.commitOffsets(WorkerSourceTask.java:318)\n\tat org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerSourceTask.execute(WorkerSourceTask.java:197)\n\tat org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerTask.doRun(WorkerTask.java:170)\n\tat org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerTask.run(WorkerTask.java:214)\n\tat java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)\n\tat java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)\n\tat java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\n\tat java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\n\tat java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)\n",
         "id":0,
         "worker_id":"svc.cluster.local:8083"
      }
   ],
   "type":"source"
}

我阅读了此问题：https://github.com/confluentinc/kafka-connect-jdbc/issues/161 并尝试根据建议更改参数值。更好，但经过一些时间后仍然失败： 现在，我的连接配置为：

OFFSET_FLUSH_INTERVAL_MS: 60000
OFFSET_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_MS: 50000
CONNECT_PRODUCER_BUFFER_MEMORY: 45554432

我还尝试了以下描述的这些值：Debezium flush timeout and OutOfMemoryError errors with MySQL

我还没有尝试过的一件事是使用snapshot.select.statement.overrides参数。 但是我不确定是否会有帮助，因为有时提交偏移量问题出现在10万条消息中。我将不得不恢复并停止连接器很多次。

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分：1)

我使用Debezium快照了MySQL数据库，该数据库具有超过30M +记录的多个表。我们有一个拥有1亿多条记录的记录。为此，我使用了select语句覆盖配置（因为它是仅INSERT的表）。

最初，使用默认设置对数据库进行快照，我遇到了与您所面临的完全相同的问题。我调整了以下配置，这有助于解决我的问题。

在worker.properties配置文件中设置的kafka connect worker配置：

offset.flush.timeout.ms=60000
offset.flush.interval.ms=10000
max.request.size=10485760

减小偏移量刷新间隔可使Kafka连接更频繁地刷新偏移量，并且设置较大的超时将使它有更多的时间来获得提交的确认。

通过curl请求传递的Debezium配置将其初始化：

max.queue.size = 81290
max.batch.size = 20480

队列的默认大小为8192，对于较大的数据库来说，这是非常小的值。将这些配置加起来很有帮助。

希望这有助于解决您的问题

相关问题
最新问题