coq中存在变量实例化的规则

时间:2020-05-14 03:04:48

标签: coq

我正在研究编程语言基础,对此感到困惑:

“现有变量不能为 用包含普通变量但不包含普通变量的术语实例化 存在变量创建时已存在。 “

为什么不呢?我能举个例子,表现出不想要的行为吗?

谢谢。

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:2)

这是一个说明性示例:

(* An empty type *)
Inductive empty : Type := .

(* A proposition quantifying existentially over an empty type can only be false... *)
Lemma this_cannot_be_true : exists x : empty, (forall y : empty, x = y).
Proof.
  eexists.   (* I'm telling you there is such an x, just put an evar ?x for now. *)
  intros y.  (* Now we must prove a universal property, so we introduce a new variable... *)
  Fail instantiate (1 := y).  (* Oh look, y : empty, let's instantiate our evar with it! *)
  (* If this didn't fail, we would have the goal (y = y), which would be proved by reflexivity. Luckily, the previous tactic failed. *)
Abort.

(* To clear out any doubt that the above proposition is false. *)
Lemma empty_type_is_empty {P : empty -> Prop} : (exists x : empty, P x) -> False.
Proof.
  intros [[]].
Qed.
相关问题