我正在使用python从外部设备进行采样,并将值存储在FIFO队列中。我有一个固定大小的数组,我从一端插入一个新样本,然后从另一端取出“最旧”值(我在这里有术语:https://stackabuse.com/stacks-and-queues-in-python/)。我为此尝试了不同的实现,每种实现的性能在很大程度上取决于FIFO数组的大小,请参见下面的示例。是否有比我收集的方法更快的方法来执行FIFO队列。另外,对于这些方法我应该关注的不是给定大小队列可以测量的速度吗?
import numpy as np
import time
import numba
@numba.njit
def fifo(sig_arr, n):
for i in range(n):
sig_arr[:-1] = sig_arr[1:]
sig_arr[-1] = i
return
n = 1000000 # number of enqueues/dequeues
for m in [100, 1000, 10000]: # fifo queue length
print("FIFO array length is:" + str(m))
print("Numpy-based queue")
sig_arr_np = np.zeros(m)
for _ in range(5):
tic = time.time()
for i in range(n):
sig_arr_np[:-1] = sig_arr_np[1:]
sig_arr_np[-1] = i
print(time.time() - tic)
print("Jitted numpy-based queue")
sig_arr_jit = np.zeros(m)
for _ in range(5):
tic = time.time()
fifo(sig_arr_jit, n)
print(time.time()-tic)
print("list-based queue")
sig_arr_list = [0]*m
for _ in range(5):
tic = time.time()
for i in range(n):
sig_arr_list.append(i)
sig_arr_list.pop(0)
print(time.time() - tic)
print("done...")
输出:
FIFO array length is:100
Numpy-based queue
0.7159860134124756
0.7160656452178955
0.7072808742523193
0.6405529975891113
0.6402220726013184
Jitted numpy-based queue
0.34624767303466797
0.10235905647277832
0.09779787063598633
0.10352706909179688
0.1059865951538086
list-based queue
0.19921231269836426
0.18682050704956055
0.178941011428833
0.190687894821167
0.18914198875427246
FIFO array length is:1000
Numpy-based queue
0.7035880088806152
0.7174069881439209
0.7061927318572998
0.7100749015808105
0.7161743640899658
Jitted numpy-based queue
0.4495429992675781
0.4449293613433838
0.4404451847076416
0.4400477409362793
0.43927478790283203
list-based queue
0.2652933597564697
0.26186203956604004
0.2784764766693115
0.27001261711120605
0.2699151039123535
FIFO array length is:10000
Numpy-based queue
2.0453989505767822
1.9288575649261475
1.9308562278747559
1.9575252532958984
2.048408269882202
Jitted numpy-based queue
5.075503349304199
5.083268404006958
5.181215286254883
5.115811109542847
5.163492918014526
list-based queue
1.2474076747894287
1.2347135543823242
1.2435767650604248
1.2809157371520996
1.237732172012329
done...
编辑:在这里,我添加了Jeff H.建议的解决方案,并将双端队列设置为固定大小,这样就不需要.pop()方法,这会使速度更快一些。
n = 1000000 # number of enqueues/dequeues
for m in [100, 1000, 10000]: # fifo queue length
print("deque-list-based queue")
d = deque([None], m)
for _ in range(3):
tic = time.time()
for i in range(n):
d.append(i)
print(time.time() - tic)
答案 0 :(得分:2)
collections.deque
为什么不尝试自然选择?
您上面的所有实现都遭受同样的糟糕性能,因为每次您入队/出队任何东西时,它们都是O(N)操作,因为它们都是列表支持的。对于FIFO,适当的数据结构会在恒定时间O(1)内完成此操作。
考虑:
从收藏中导入双端队列
from collections import deque
n = 1000000 # number of enqueues/dequeues
for m in [100, 1000, 10000, 1_000_000]: # fifo queue length
print(f'\nqueue length: {m}')
print('deque')
d = deque(range(m))
for _ in range(5):
tic = time.time()
for i in range(n):
d.append(i)
d.pop()
print(time.time() - tic)
print("done...")
收益:(请注意,较大的m值和接近恒定的时间,无论大小如何,均优于以上所有条件
queue length: 100
deque
0.13888287544250488
0.13873004913330078
0.13820695877075195
0.1369168758392334
0.1436598300933838
queue length: 1000
deque
0.1434800624847412
0.13672494888305664
0.1380469799041748
0.14961719512939453
0.13932228088378906
queue length: 10000
deque
0.14437294006347656
0.14214491844177246
0.13336801528930664
0.14667487144470215
0.1375408172607422
queue length: 1000000
deque
0.13426589965820312
0.13596534729003906
0.13602590560913086
0.13472890853881836
0.134993314743042
done...
[Finished in 3.4s]